Imagining how the Seattle Coyotes Will Affect NHL Realignment

Last week everyone was surprised by the NHLPA’s plan to put the kaibosh on realignment for the 2012-13 season. Many are casting this as a doom and gloom for another lost season, but I just don’t think that’s the case. There is way too much money on the table, for all sides, to risk losing so much time again.

I am of the opinion that the NHL will be realigned in some way next  season. It’s ridiculous to have Winnipeg be in the Southeast Division for one more year. However, there is one more ball that needs to drop before they can commit to a new plan, the $25 million (a year) question. Who will own the Phoenix Coyotes and where will they play?

After a failed attempt to completely blow up the league, the NHL still could do some sort of a change. I think that they are waiting until the Phoenix mess sorts itself out, so they don’t need to do something awkward like moving Columbus to the Southeast Division only to have to change them back a year or two later, and after they’ve moved all the way up to 13th in the Conference!

Apparently the front-runners for a Coyotes new home are Kansas City, Seattle, Las Vegas, Quebec City, or Somewhere in Southern Ontario.

Should the Coyotes make the move, it gives a convenient way to make some sort of a swap. I mean Kansas City is only slightly more Pacific than Dallas is, and nobody would be stupid enough to have them in that division, right?

In this post, I’ll look at what the NHL could look like if Phoenix moves to either Seattle, with more posts coming later on this week with a focus on each other location for the ‘Yotes. I’ll try to keep some geographic sense, and preserve traditional rivalries as best as possible.

THE SEATTLE COYOTES

This to me is the most likely scenario, especially after Bill Daly went so far as to publicly state “there is a group interested in bringing hockey to the Seattle area” last July, with rumours ramping up this past December. The Pacific Northwest is a massively untapped hockey market, and I am kind of surprised that Seattle or Portland weren’t considered more thoroughly in the last round of expansion that brought such A-list cities as Nashville and Columbus to the dance.

Obviously, moving a team in Seattle could stay in the Pacific Division with little to no problem. So everything stays the same, right? Well not so fast here. Dallas, with it’s proximity to the Gulf of Mexico (and therefore Atlantic Ocean) has no business playing in the Pacific Division. They just got a new owner, who I could see Bettman trying to please with a shift of division where they don’t have to start a majority of their games starting at 10 local time.

So who takes Dallas’s place in the Pacific Division? Well, Canadian fans won’t be happy but I think that the Vancouver Canucks are the team to make the move, especially with a team in Seattle, creating a nice cross-border rivalry in the same vein as Toronto-Buffalo or Minnesota-Winnipeg. Plus, all five teams would be in the Pacific Division, and Vancouver is almost 300km closer to Anaheim than they are to Winnipeg.

In short, things would look like this.

I have Columbus moving East but it doesn’t make much of a difference if Nashville goes instead from this alignment. I think that Columbus’s struggle off-ice makes them a stronger contender to move. The last thing that Gary Bettman wants is another of the teams to come in during his watch to move. So if moving Columbus East lessens the financial hemorrhaging that’s going on in Ohio, then so be it. Of course, Columbus would want to go to either the Northeast Division or more likely the Atlantic Division, but I doubt that’s going to happen. If they go to the Northeast Division, then it starts a domino effect that no doubt pushes the Bruins to the Atlantic, and the Flyers or Penguins to the Southeast, which I think will be pretty unlikely to happen. So the Southeast it is for them, even if Central Ohio is neither South, not East in the grand scheme of things.

In this map I was able to get Dallas to the Central Division where they belong at the expense of Minnesota who would also like to join Detroit and Chicago. But Vancouver swapping out for nearby Winnipeg is sure to be a good thing for fans in the Twin Cities. However, if pleasing the Minnesota Wild is important, and so is keeping all the Western Canadian teams in the same division, we could get something like….

I much prefer the first option now that I look at it. Lumping Seattle in with four Canadian teams would not bode well for building a fan base. Although I guess Dallas would be slightly appeased with the addition of Colorado to their division, since they are only one Time Zone away, unlike the rest of their division.

Although there is a third sort of hybrid option here that could look like this…

This would have the Avalanche moving out of the Northwest, where they probably don’t belong, and same for the Stars, who really are a Central Team. The big losers here would be Minnesota. But they would at least get the nearby rival in Winnipeg, a team that they actually share a Time Zone with, so baby steps here I suppose.

Personally I prefer Option #1, due to it’s focus on Time Zones, but I think that Option #3 would be the most likely. I think that the NHL will do a small change for next year with a full scale blow up the league approach later in a few years.

Which just for a reminder gets us this:

PACIFIC: Los Angeles, Anaheim, San Jose, Vancouver, Seattle
NORTHWEST: Edmonton, Calgary, Winnipeg, Minnesota, Colorado
CENTRAL: Detroit, Chicago, Nashville, St. Louis, Dallas
NORTHEAST: Toronto, Ottawa, Buffalo, Montreal, Boston
ATLANTIC: Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, New Jersey, New York Rangers, New York Islanders
SOUTHEAST: Washington, Columbus, Carolina, Florida, Tampa Bay

Or what the hell, we could leave the Jets in the Southeast, because that makes so much sense, doesn’t it?

This approach could work just as well if the team moves to Portland, which would be more or less the same, although it would be less urgent to get them in the same division as Vancouver. Of course, I wouldn’t expect a team in Portland or Seattle to be called they Coyotes. They would probably come up with some new fun names like the Rosebuds or Metropolitans. Because dead franchises make great names upon their triumphant return, don’t they?

 

 

Click for other Posts in this series.

5 thoughts on “Imagining how the Seattle Coyotes Will Affect NHL Realignment

  1. Pingback: Imagining How the Kansas City Coyotes Will Effect NHL Realignment | Blade Jobs of Steel

  2. As a Seattle denizen myself, I can promise you that being in a division with four Canadian teams would not be a problem. There’s as much pride in our region (Cascadia, the Pacific Northwest) as there is in our country, so the best strategy for getting Seattle fans involved is by having as many geographically close teams as possible. In an ideal world, that would mean Seattle, Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary, and Portland. Since Portland is a long shot, Winnipeg or San Jose would be better options. In other words, to maximize Seattle’s potential, option 2 is probably best. That makes for a relatively simple southwest division (though a Salt Lake team would be preferable to Dallas any day).
    Also, thanks for the kind words on my own realignment project (via Tom Fulery). If this move to Seattle goes through, you’ll be hearing a lot about area hockey through the site he linked. I hope you’ll come back.

  3. Thanks for your perspectives here! Being from Southern Ontario I can only try to guess how someone from the West Coast would think about things. I keep hearing that Minnesota and Colorado are apprehensive about being the lone American team in a “Canadian” Division, so I would assume Seattle would think the same, especially as they try to establish a fan base.

    My one concern with that division is that it spans three Time Zones (much like the Pacific one) and that sort of sucks. Although I have a feeling that Winnipeg hockey fans would stay up all hours of the night to watch their team, making it less of an issue.

    It is looking more and more like this move will go through, the league knows how much money they can make by charging Canadian cities expansion fees so they may put off a Toronto or Quebec relocation unless they are completely desperate.

  4. Well here’s a Quebec City fan’s fantasy realignment.

    I would move the Coyotes to QuebecCity for 2013-14 season and expand to Markham and Seattle a couple years later.The thing i have heard as the major sticking point to realignment is that Detroit and Chicago want to transfer to the eastern conference.

    Here’s my suggestion:

    Western Conference

    Pacific
    San Jose
    Los Angeles
    Anaheim
    Dallas
    Colorado

    Northwest
    Vancouver
    Edmonton
    Calgary
    Winnipeg
    Minnesota

    South
    St-Louis
    Nashville
    Carolina
    Tampa Bay
    Florida

    Eastern Conference

    Central
    Chicago
    Detroit
    Buffalo
    Toronto
    Ottawa

    Northeast
    Montreal
    Quebec City
    Boston
    NY Islanders
    NY Rangers

    Atlantic
    New Jersey
    Philadelphia
    Pittsburgh
    Washington
    Columbus

    I think it’s pretty geographically logical.Obviously Tampa ,Florida and Carolina would complain. I think there are in no financial position to do so.

    With the expansion, i would add Seattle to the Northwest and Markham to the Central.

  5. Hey that’s a great suggestion, I really like the Southern Division, it makes a ton of sense. Although splitting the Devils from the Rangers and Islanders would be a tough sell

    With the bombshell that we got this past weekend about the realignment plan then things are probably in a bit of a weird state right now. Now if we ended up with no Coyotes plus new teams in Markham, Quebec, and Seattle then things get a little awkward since you would need to get both of Detroit and Columbus to move back West to make room, unless things get a little strange.

    Off the top of my head maybe they could do a four conference format like this:

    Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Colorado, Anaheim, LA, San Jose, Seattle

    Winnipeg, Minnesota, Chicago, St. Louis, Dallas, Nashville, Florida, Tampa Bay

    Detroit, Toronto, Markham, Montreal, Quebec, Buffalo, Boston, Ottawa

    Columbus, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Carolina, NY Rangers, NY Islanders, Washington, New Jersey

    Again, this is pretty bad for Florida and Tampa…and Winnipeg and Minnesota but maybe some scheduling could solve that somehow or another. The other option would be to get Winnipeg and Minnesota in with Toronto but that would no doubt mean that some other teams would have to go soon enough. The NHL is in a bit of a tough situation, but I guess that’s part of the fun!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>